Alec, thank you for taking the time to read and share your thoughts. I largely agree with the points you've made.
Race, as you rightly mentioned, is a social construct formed to categorize people based on various physical traits, behaviors, and habitats. Its origins and purposes can differ depending on different perspectives throughout history and societies.
Throughout history, prejudices and discriminations based on differences in ethnicity, culture, or lineage have been present across many cultures. This bias against perceived outsiders or different groups was prevalent in ancient societies worldwide. The expansion of European colonialism entrenched racial categories, significantly shaping modern racial hierarchies and leading to the exploitation of various groups globally. This impacts all of us, including those who benefit from these hierarchies and privileges in the United States.
The construct of race has led to disparities and inequalities among different racial groups. These disparities encompass unequal access to resources, opportunities, and fair treatment within social systems, contributing to economic, educational, and social gaps. Such inequalities stem from historical discrimination, biases, and the unequal distribution of power within societies.
These observations aren't based on mere technicalities, beliefs, or ideologies; they are supported by thousands of years of human history and contemporary data highlighting existing disparities. Additionally, in various places, including the United States, laws oftentimes reinforce these disparities.
Regarding your paper's synopsis, stating "There is no such thing as race or color in the sense we suppose," I see where it aligns. However, from a practical standpoint, this statement might be perceived similarly to saying "I am colorblind" or "All lives matter." It could be seen as disregarding or discrediting the undeniable realities and consequences tied to the construct of race and its associated prejudices. These realities need acknowledgment and understanding beyond mere statements that seemingly negate their significance.
With that, I might take some time to read your paper to gain a deeper understanding of your perspective and avoid and misinterpretations---and circle back to continue to discuss!.
Thank you again for adding additional perspective to the conversation.
